|
|
PEER REVIEW PROCESS |
The authors are kindly asked to correctly format and submit their manuscripts, according to the formatting instructions. The manuscripts could be submitted online or by e-mail.
Description of the peer-review process
The peer-review process of the Journal "Annals of University of Oradea. Fascicle of Textiles, Leatherwork", is performed as single blind, system in which the names of the reviewers are unknown to the authors, but the names of the authors are known to reviewers and editors.
The peer review process is conducted into three steps:
1. The Editor-in-Chief or Executive Editor decides if each paper corresponds to the topics of the journal and if it fulfills the quality requirements in order to follow the review process. The rejected papers will be not further processed. The author of the manuscript receives, from the Journal’s Editor-in-Chief, a message that's highly briefly motivating what is/ are the argument/ arguments for the rejection of the manuscript at this stage.
2. The distribution of the manuscript for review, to two scientific reviewers, selected by the Journal’s Editor in chief and one of the Executive Editors, member of the Journal’s Editorial Board.
The reviewers submit their reports to the Journal’s Editor-in-Chief or Executive Editor with one of the following actions:
Reject: Content inappropriate to the journal or has little merit
Probable Reject: Basic flaws in content or presentation or very poorly written
Marginal Tend to Reject: Not as badly flawed; major effort necessary to make acceptable but content well-covered in literature already.
Marginal Tend to Accept: Content has merit, but accuracy, clarity, completeness, and/or writing should and could be improved in time
Clear Accept: Content, presentation, and writing meet professional norms; improvements may be advisable but acceptable as is
Must Accept: Candidate for outstanding paper. Suggested improvements still appropriate
3. After the submission of the reports from all the reviewers, the Editor-in-Chief can take one of the following decisions:
a. Publish without changes;
b. Publish after minor changes;
c. Review again after major changes;
d. Reject.
The peer- review process concludes at the time when the Journal’s Editor- in- Chief decides that the manuscript is accepted for publication and the statement of copyright transfer release has been received from the corresponding author.
|
INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE AUTHORS |
Original, unpublished contributions are expected. Papers should be informative and concentrate on results. The authors should submit the full paper for reviewing.
The contributions accepted by the International Program Committee will be presented in the Session. Selected papers from those presented at the conference will be included in the Journal “Annals of The University of Oradea. Fascicle of Textiles, Leatherwork”, ISSN 1843-813X, classified in B category by the former National University Research Council (CNCSIS) and indexed by several international databases:
•EBSCO
•Index Copernicus
•Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
•Ulrich's Update - Periodicals Directory
•Google Scholar
•Directory of Research Journals indexing
•International Impact Factor Services
•Scipio
Paper presentation will be in oral sessions grouped by interest and should not exceed 15 minutes.
Requirements for scientific paper:
Title of the paper: capital letters, bold, centred, font NTR 14 pts. Enter 2 clear lines after title.
Author(s) SURNAME and First name (without title or profession): SURNAME, First Name, bold, centred, on one centred column, font NTR, 12pts. Enter 1 clear line after authors.
Affiliation: italics, upper and lower cases, centred, on one centred column, font NTR 9 pts. Enter 1 clear lines after affiliation.
Corresponding author: Surname, First name, e-mail address, font NTR 10 pts. Enter 1 clear lines after corresponding author
Abstract: The abstract should contain 200 - 250 words, font NTR 10 pts, italic, justified.
Keywords: 5 - 6 keywords, font NTR 10 pts, italic, left aligned. Key words should not repeat the title of the paper. Enter 3 clear lines after keywords.
Chapter titles: capitals, bold, left aligned, font NTR, 12 pts numbered in Arabs. Enter one clear line after title.
Subtitles: decimal numbering (i.e. 1.1, 1.2, 1.3,) left aligned, bold, NTR, 11pts.
Paragraphs should be typed with no indentation, in NTR, 11 pts., single spaced, justified.
The paper should be written on standard A4 (297 x 210 mm) sheets, with 15 mm (left-right) and 25 mm (top-bottom) margins. Enter one clear line between paragraphs, and between paragraph’s end and the next title.
Length of the paper should be of 4 or 6 pages, on A4 paper, written in plain English. Please do not submit papers with more than 6 or less than 4 pages.
Figures and Tables: included in text, numbered in Arabs. Each figure should have a caption placed below the picture, NTR 10 pts, italic, centred. Use high quality pictures and drawings.
Equations: Equations are left justified 5 mm from left with equation number at the right margin in font TNR 11 pt Italic
References: Citations in text should be made with Arab numerals in square brackets. References should be presented in consecutive order (as they are referred to in the text) at the end of the paper, after one clear line in NTR 11 pts. References will be given in the original language. Please include at least 6 items.
Example of well done SCIENTIFIC PAPER
Requirements for extended abstract:
The abstract has to be written in doc format. Please use the A4 Format (297 x 210 mm); Margins: top, bottom-45 mm each, right and left -40 mm each. The abstract of the paper should be written in plain English. The abstract should have 200-250 words. Please use Times New Roman fonts, line spacing single. The font formats are: paper title: 14 pt bold, capital letters; author's name(s):12 pt bold; key words: 10 pt; text: 11 pt. The length of the abstract it has to be not more than 2 (two) pages.
Example of well done ABSTRACT
|
| |
Copyright 2016
The responsibility for the content of each paper is solely upon the authors. Accordingly, neither the University of Oradea, nor their officers, members of the editorial board, are responsible for the accuracy of any published paper. |
|
